Our? CountryMarty Buchaus January 12, 2021 [politics] #bejingbiden #i-da-hoHarris #seceed
Any who know me know that I don't hide or even limit the voicing of my opinions. This will be no different. I no longer call our county the United States of America. We are only the States of America, as we are no longer united. I've also maintained for years that the county is too big and needs to be separated. We do not have representation in Washington. (without representation I don't have to pay taxes right!) Take a look at Redstatesecession.org They have the right Idea. Specifically This Status Article, and This on tolerated secession.
The complete mockery of our general election is appalling. A summary of why we lost the election.
TL-DR: is that our "supposed" representation failed us and allowed fraudulent, the dead and non-citizen votes. by the way not all non-citizens are in the country Illegally. but all non-citizen votes ARE Illegal.
Now onto Media and "Big Tech" media. With the resulting ban of the POTUS on twatter and facistbook. (though he should have used different platforms IMO) sets a precedence on their "PLATFORMS" see Section 230 on wikipedia. summarized as
Section 230, as passed, has two primary parts both listed under §230(c) as the "Good Samaritan" portion of the law. Section 230(c)(1), as identified above, defines that an information service provider shall not be treated as a "publisher or speaker" of information from another provider. Section 230(c)(2) provides immunity from civil liabilities for information service providers that remove or restrict content from their services they deem "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected", as long as they act "in good faith" in this action.
This has been used to censor and remove non affiliated sentiments that the "PLATFORM" doesn't like nor their political benefactors. And under the Smith Mundt Act that was amended in 2012 and signed by (most racist president ever) to allow propaganda outlined as "public diplomacy" to be disseminated within the US.. So NO he didn't authorize the creation of propaganda, he signed the bill to allow its wide spread repeat repeat repeat until those who will not think for themselves, believe what is being regurgitated.
(( FaCtChEcK BS stating Obama didn't authorize Lying. < that is true he didn't he did however signed the amendment that allowed the broadcast and wide dissemination of the propaganda. Funny how the article completely overlooks that. and that the state has been able to generate propaganda in the past just not broadcast it. )).
As day job things take me away from the point I was trying to make with this post, I'll leave This here. I don't believe that Biden or I Da Ho will be presedent of the country I live in. I believe in the (orderly secession of like minded states into a more perfect union) or a Civil war to Bring the government under control of the people again, not just the city dwelling "recipients"
Back to top